Market Dynamics:
The increasing interest of scientists and biotechnology companies in stem cell research will drive the market. Increasing the adoption of 3D cell culture will drive the market in the forecast period.
The increasing interest of scientists and biotechnology companies in stem cell research will drive the market
The research that studies the properties of stem cells and their potential use in animal-derived is known as stem-cell research. Stem cells are the source of all tissues, by understanding their properties helps understanding of the healthy and diseased body’s development and homeostasis. These cells always balance between self-renewal and differentiation. According to stem cell biology understanding and the latest technological developments parameters of stem cell culture are critical and need to be refined continuously. They hold great promise for cell therapy, tissue engineering, regenerative animal-derived, and pharmaceutical and biotechnological applications. They can self-renew and the ability to differentiate into specialized cell types depending upon their source of isolation. However, the use of SCs for clinical applications requires high quality and quantity of cells. This necessitates the large-scale expansion of SCs followed by efficient and homogeneous differentiation into functional derivatives. Traditional methods for maintaining and developing cells rely on two-dimensional (2-D) culturing techniques using plastic culture plates and xenogenic media. These methods provide limited expansion, cells tend to lose clonal and differentiation capacity upon long-term passaging.
Download Free Sample: https://www.datamintelligence.com/download-sample/cell-culture-protein-surface-coating-market
Increasing the adoption of 3D cell culture will drive the cell culture protein surface coating market in the forecast period
Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture systems have increased interest in drug discovery and tissue engineering due to their evident advantages in providing more physiologically relevant information and more predictive data for in vivo tests. A growing body of evidence has suggested that 3D cell culture systems, in contrast to the 2D culture system, represent more accurately the actual microenvironment where cells reside in tissues. Thus, the behavior of 3D-cultured cells is more reflective of in vivo cellular responses. Research has found that cells in the 3D culture environment differ morphologically and physiologically from cells in the 2D culture environment. The additional dimensionality of 3D cultures is the crucial feature leading to the differences in cellular responses. It not only influences the spatial organization of the cell surface receptors engaged in interactions with surrounding cells, but it also induces physical constraints to cells. These spatial and physical aspects in 3D cultures affect the signal transduction from the outside to the inside of cells and ultimately influence gene expression and cellular behavior. It has been demonstrated that cell responses in 3D cultures are more similar to in vivo behavior compared to 2D cultures. In the past several years, tremendous effort has been put into the development of a variety of 3D culture systems and the adoption of 3D cell culture systems in drug discovery, cancer cell biology, stem cell study, engineered functional tissues for implantation, and other cell-based analysis. Hence it will drive the market.
Research & Development Systems offer a range of microplates aseptically prepared and pre-coated with extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins for quantifying cell adhesion and culturing adherent cell lines.
The drawbacks related to cell culture protein surface coating will hamper the market
The disadvantages of cell culture are: highly skilled personnel, techniques must be performed using strict asepsis techniques because animal cells grow slower than many of the common contaminants (e.g., bacteria, viruses, and fungi). Additionally, animal cells may not survive when isolated and, therefore, cannot have an independent sustainable existence without providing a complex environment. One of the main limitations of cell culture is the expense and effort required to obtain a relatively low amount of cells.
In addition, tissue composition is variable and heterogeneous. Replicas from the same sample have various constituents. To replicate an experimental result, cell lines must be manipulated many times in serial passages. For instance, every culture will be different from the original and less uniform in its constitution. The replicas are randomly mixed in each passage to resolve this issue, and the selective pressure of growing conditions tends to produce an optimal prevalent phenotype. These disadvantages will hamper the Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market
COVID-19 Impact Analysis:
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the research and development sector globally. It has resulted in nationwide lockdown, impacting every industry. Likewise, the cell culture protein surface coating market is also affected because manufacturers shut down their business due to COVID-19 norms.
Segment Analysis:
The precoating segment will dominate the cell culture protein surface coating market
Coating as an additional surface treatment stands for all additional modifications made to increase cell adhesion and the standard plasma or corona treatment performed on all cell culture plastic by the manufacturer. Usually, a coating is done with proteins or peptides. Corning BioCoat cell culture inserts are pre-coated with extracellular matrix proteins for applications requiring a protein-coated cell surface, such as cell adhesion, growth, invasion, migration, and differentiation. Coatings include Corning Matrigel® matrix, Fibronectin, Collagen, and Laminin.
Synthetic material will dominate the cell culture protein surface coating market
The growing demand for animal-free components will drive the market in this region. Synthetic material systems can be specifically designed to interact with cells on different length scales (e.g., molecular, cellular, and macroscopic) and thereby mimic the elements of natural stem cell niches. These synthetic materials offer the potential for improved control, repeatability, safety, and scalability in contrast with their natural counterparts.
To direct stem cell phenotype a broad variety of synthetic materials has been designed and created. Natural polymers, typically elements of mammalian ECM or structural components from other organisms (e.g., alginate or chitosan), can be chemically, thermally, or physically processed to alter their chemistry, mechanics, degradation, and biological performance. Synthetic polymers offer a wide range of controlled chemistries and mechanical properties due to the variety of available monomers and co-polymer structures. Popular synthetic polymer types include polyacrylamides, polyacrylates, polyethers, polyesters, polyhydroxy acids, polyfumarates, and polyphosphazene. Self-assembling peptides, peptide-amphiphiles, and genetically engineered proteins allow the incorporation of specific cell-engaging motifs into rationally designed chemical biology assemblies. Inorganic materials are used to mimic the osteogenic niche, while hybrids and composites combine the aforementioned classes to create unique, application-specific matrices.
Visit The Full Report: https://www.datamintelligence.com/research-report/cell-culture-protein-surface-coating-market
Geographical Analysis:
North America will dominate the market
The highly developed healthcare and research infrastructure and presence of advanced technology, presence of leading biotechnology companies will drive the market in this region. This region has a large focus on drug discovery.
Although last year pharmaceutical companies were unable to top the record-shattering 59 new drugs approved in the US in 2018, they are still on a roll. In 2019, the Food and Drug Administration green-lighted 48 Animal-derived, a crop that includes myriad modalities and many new treatments for long-neglected diseases.
Based on latest revenues available as of 2020, Johnson & Johnson was the leading pharmaceutical company in the United States. The firm annually generates over 80 billion U.S. dollars, which is around 30 billion U.S. dollars more than Pfizer’s next ranked company. However, Johnson & Johnson’s total revenue also includes sales from their medical device and consumer health divisions, while Pfizer is a pure-play pharmaceutical company.
Competitive Landscape:
Major key players cell culture protein surface coating market are Corning Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Merck KGaA, PerkinElmer, Inc., Greiner Bio-One International GmbH, BioVision, Inc., Trevigen Inc. BioVision, Inc., Manus Aktteva Biopharma, Donboo Amino Acid, Wuxi Enovo Chemical, and Xinyi Hanling Biological Engineering.
Media Contact
Company Name: DataM Intelligence
Contact Person: Sai
Email: Send Email
Phone: +1 877 441 4866
Country: United States
Website: https://www.datamintelligence.com/research-report/cell-culture-protein-surface-coating-market